I can readily admit that I'm not exactly the most educated regarding how certain muscle fibers work together, or how exactly all of the protein fibers are degraded by specific training methods. That's why I ask questions from time to time about these things, because apparently my BA in bio-chem has simply not provided me with the kind of knowledge base that some of the guys here have. They know FAR more than I do.
That being said, I have a good deal of what I'd call "experience under the bar." I can say that mentally a squat is like a golf-swing for me. "Grab bar, spread feet, hands in, elbows forward, GET TIGHT, TIGHT, up, step back 1, 2, feet right/left, press to outsides of feet, chest up, knees out, STAY TIGHT, butt back, control bar down, SQUEEZE THE BAR and STAY TIGHT, elbows forward, ...deep enough...., PUSH PUSH PUSH...Drive UP." (the last part of the thinking process starts to be far less 'mental cues' and more of a feeling that I've had over and over. I would relate it to what He-Man was feeling when he yelled out "I HAVE THE POWWWEEEERRRR!!!" Things often get fuzzy here, and I end up with tunnel vision if it's a good lift for me.)
My real reason for getting disheartened, is that too often (WAY too often) I am being lectured on how my system doesn't work to make you stronger or more powerful by some guy who's all of #130 and has upper arms the size of my wrists. I keep hearing that I should be doing more "alternate side crunches" to get my "6-pack." I used to be far more defensive, as in "dude, I have eaten 3 steaks, 2 sweet potatoes, drank 1/2 gallon of whole milk, 3 heaping handfulls of raw spinach, an orange, a banana, 1 chicken breast, 6 slices of bacon, some celery, and 1/2 dozen eggs...and it's only 4p.m. Do you really think I'm going to have a well-defined '6 pack' because I did some crunches?" Now, I use a simple test to determine if something belongs in my extremely simple system. "Does this make me better?" My goals are simple, my basic programming is simple, I don't add extra exercises unless they make sense in my big picture, and I don't really care about fads being promoted by a guy who can probably tell me as much about strength as he can about the rules to D&D.
So now, when these conversations come up, I use a basic test to explain why I think that their program sucks. I look the guy in the eyes and say, "Before I pick up a new exercise, I think, 'If I were in prison...would this help me avoid being man-raped?' If the answer is 'no,' then it has no business in my practice."
It's not science, exactly, but for the most part I feel pretty awesome at the end of the day. I'm bigger, stronger, and faster than I was a few months ago. I have had to get creative to break through certain "sticking points" but thanks to research from guys like Louie Simmons and Dave Tate, I can simply see what worked for them and run with it. Amazingly, the age of entitlement stretches everywhere. Guys keep trying to come up with why they need a "customized" system, because they're "special" or "different"...NO YOU ARE JUST A PUSSY! Get under the bar 4 days a week for the next 5 years, and then get back to me.