Author Topic: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article  (Read 2689 times)

Offline Joe Brock

  • #1 Coach
  • Moderator
  • Hirundo Rustica
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: +55/-7
  • THIS IS SPARTA!
    • View Profile
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #40 on: February 14, 2011, 12:45:37 AM »
Weight training is a great source of PREhabilitation for plyometrics.  Olympic style, or SS style whatever you prefer to call it has been shown in multiple studies to be the safest form of weight training.  Stone, M. H., A. C. Fry, M. Ritchie, L. Stoessel-Ross, and J. L. Marsit. Injury potential and safety aspects of weightlifting movements. Strength and Conditioning. June: 15-21. 1994.  Especially when the practitioner is active in another sport, ie: parkour for instance.  Only 23% of lifters complained of back pain during cross training as opposed to 31% of normal active men. Granhed, H. et al. Low back pain among retired wrestlers and heavyweight lifters. The American Journal of Sports Medicine,16(5):530-533. 1988.    Also, it has been shown multiple times to promote leaner body composition Stone, M.H., et al. Cardiovascular Responses to Short-Term Olympic Style Weight-Training in Young Men. Can. J. Appl. Sport Sci. 8(3): 134-9.  A study was performed and a group of lifters did various Olympic lifts (High pulls, Power Clean, and Clean and Jerk), and were compared to a group using vertical jump exercises (Single and Double Leg Hurdles Hops, Alternated Single-leg Hurdle Hops, etc) and after the 8 weeks of training the Olympic weightlifting group had significantly increased their 10 meter sprint speed and their standing jump over the control group using standard vertical jump exercises.  Tricoli, V, L Lamas, R Carnevale, and C Ugrinowitsch. "Short-Term Effects on Lower-Body Functional Power Development: Weightlifting Vs. Vertical Jump Training Programs." 19 (2005): 433-437. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 19 (2005).

I'm not saying that weight training alone will make you a better traceur, but I would say that science speaks volumes about the potential improvement for ANY sport that comes from weight training.  I believe you will be hard pressed to convince me that (with similar experience in the technical aspects of parkour) a man of equal height who does NO weight training, who's not running with lean body composition, will EVER outperform a man of similar height who can squat 700lbs.  It's not feasible, and assuming that they train for the same period of time, the one who is supplementing their training with weight lifting should suffer less long-term injury.

As far as "being strong to be useful" is concerned...how is being able to pick up a car not useful?  :)  I agree, strength (not power...as you have stated Nate...because they are VERY different things) alone will not a great traceur make.  It takes a more "well-rounded" individual to truly have the most tools at their disposal.   
Joe; Always good to look for harder and harder skills. If you're ever the strongest person in the gym, go find a stronger gym.-Jim (from BeastSkills)
Posts are not to be mistaken for medical advice, good sense, or anything other than "under the bar" experience from an amateur powerlifter/coach.

Offline Chris Salvato

  • Moderator
  • Hirundo Rustica
  • *****
  • Posts: 3897
  • Karma: +326/-63
  • Eat. Move. Improve.
    • View Profile
    • Eat. Move. Improve.
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #41 on: February 14, 2011, 12:51:20 AM »
Now you get to prep for a rant... a respectful rant, of course.

I haven't bothered looking into pkgens training methods but from previous posts in this thread it seems to be "pointless conditioning" or something to that extent. In Australia, we do a lot of conditioning and depending on the individual, strength training. I've watched the progression of my community and it seems this "pointless conditioning" has some merit. The leaders and students of the community continue to see gains (in terms of power) through repetition (whether it be a series of challenging plyos or simple pistol squats). Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like most people in the American parkour community are training for power and only power.

I don't like the words "you're wrong", so I will put it this way - you have the wrong impression of how people in the American parkour community train - and how the American parkour community PROMOTES that one should train.

Firstly, the "gains" you are seeing from the "conditioning" you are doing is due to the fact that people who are untrained (that is, dont or never have followed a training program) seem to gain strength very quickly because of neurological adaptation and motor learning.  This only gets you so far, but to the average joe this seems terrific.  Once you get to a certain point though, supplementing your sport training (parkour outings, lets say) with S&C (stands for strength and conditioning) is going to help you much more than randomly jumping around.  After all, by that stage, you have probably executed 10s of thousands of jumps, but still haven't worked on the strength you need to progress beyond that.

Secondly - I think you are defining "conditioning" wrong. The conditioning in S&C means the act of preparing your body for an event or force or situation.  Conditioning means to change your body in some way.  PKGen promotes what I call "pointless conditioning" because the exercises that they call "conditioning" do not prepare the body in the way that they are saying it does.  In fact, it makes it more vulnerable to injury.  Any orthopedic, personal trainer or experienced intellectual trainee will (and should) tell you that.  Now, don't get me wrong, I am not saying that these professionals are some sort of end-all, but to ignore this and think that jumping up and down for 45 minutes straight is somehow helping your vertical leap is laughable and irresponsible.  

Finally, just because we here in General Fitness say that one should take up an adequate S&C program doesnt mean every traceur in America is actually doing this.  On the contrary, most American's train like the rest of the world - just randomly jumping around off of and on top of things.  Some people try to shoot for goals like "that really big gap at the park" or "that long K-to-P with a front flip" -- but many also just cat walk for miles in all sorts of wacky variations as their main conditioning method.  All of this is mostly thanks to PKGen.

(TL;DR up until now - What you are calling conditioning is not conditioning.  You are seeing gains because your trainees are what is considered "untrained" or "novices" in the terms of S&C.  We DO promote conditioning, even though most American's don't actually take our advice).

Is parkour just a seriess of plyometric movements?
Is parkour the amount of weight you squat?
What happened to being strong to be useful?
You talk about being compared to elite athletes. How "useuful" are elite athletes?
Ever compared yourself to a soldier? Lets be particular - an elite special forces soldier? Now their purpose is much greater than killing as they have such a diverse skill set. Just as parkour's purpose is much greater than jumping and climbing.

Parkour is none of these things and all of these things.  Strong to be useful - YES this is the point. We are promoting strength that is USEFUL.  If you think that training and achieving even a modest goal of a 1.5xBW squat is NOT useful, then you have never done it and cannot fully appreciate the doors this opens up in your training.  And as much as a 1.5xBW squat opens doors, a 2.5xBW DL and 2.2xBW squat opens even more doors.  Strong to be useful - this is strength that is very useful.  Sadly, this is not something that can be explained, but needs to be experienced.

Now this is what I believe separates the Australian community from other communities.
We train like soldiers.
No, we don't pack (or ruck) march or do any direct military training per se.
But we train to test ourselves physically and mentally using the movements in parkour (swimming, fighting and longboarding included). It's not something we do everyday. That's dangerous. This is done once a week.
We're still powerful practitioners. You've seen our videos. I respect and appreciate your stance on strength training for parkour, I'm not trying to shut you down.

And I am all for grueling training that would product even a rough, brutal, never-stop soldier.  But TRACEURS AREN'T TRAINING THIS WAY.  Jumping around in a park for 3 hours 1x a week and doing some army crawls on the ground is great, really great - its fun and it DOES prepare you for army-type stuff....but have you ever walked your groups through workouts that you would find on www.crossfit.com or www.sealfit.com?  Now, I don't agree with everything done in these workouts - but they are f#cking GRUELING.  This kind of shit prepares you to be a soldier.  Jumping around for 4 hours and doing fireman's carries or whatever you do does not.  If you DO do thing similar to sealfit/crossfit or strength training, then I stand corrected; but I would be VERY surprised if you did.

There is also a difference between grueling and excessive volume for a purpose, like mental toughness, and purposeless, like PKGen's 2 hour dive bomber pushup workout or training 6 days a week with mixed 5/3/1 and parkour training, for example.

I too lift weights. I have to now that I'm pcl deficient.
Being able to squat ***lbs doesn't make you good at parkour. The way you guys train (I know very little on how thought seems very lifting dominant) seems a little naive.

I think I addressed these above, but to reiterate...

Being able to squat XXX lbs doesn't make you good at parkour.  Of course not.  But it prepares your body AND it opens a lot of doors in your training that you can't appreciate until you actually do it.

The little you know of how we train is off.  We train just like you guys - everyone all around the world, whether we all like it or not, trains parkour THE SAME EXACT WAY.  It comes to the training we promote ASIDE from parkour, to supplement it, that the nations seem to differ.  Here at APK our community promotes a solid lifting program to supplement your parkour training that is based on science.  I have yet to see another community base their promoted training regimens on science - its all based on "this guy has more experience than me, so I am going to do what he says."

I am sorry, but if you make your living on parkour (i.e. Blane and the trainers at PK Gen) then you need to understand the science behind training, even if you just choose to refute it.  Saying "I don't know, therefore it is not good" just doesnt cut the mustard anymore.


BTW, you didn't look like a troll - it has been great talking to you thus far.


EDIT: Just wanted to add this; Strong to be useful is a good quote - so is "Power is nothing without control."  These are probably my 2 favorite PK quotes.  That aside, what is Control without power?  Just as useless.  Its time we actually started training our power, so we actually have something to control.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2011, 12:54:29 AM by Chris Salvato »
Eat. Move. Improve.
My Training Log

The little I know I owe to my ignorance.
—Orville Mars

Offline Res

  • Oryctolagus Cuniculus
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #42 on: February 14, 2011, 01:27:37 AM »
Hey Cool I still have an account on here! Damn I wish I didn't arrive 40 posts in, but i still have a couple of things to say that I think might be useful.

I've been lifting weights for 8 years
I've done a lot ... A LOT of bullshit programs
I think when I started parkour I was going to the gym for bodybuilding, and didn't even make a solid connection between parkour and weights for 2 years!
Point I'm trying to make here is you're going to do a lot of shit wrong, and change opinions a lot, so just keep an open mind, and accept that you're all going to make a lot of mistakes!

I did 5/3/1 for about 6 months. My military press and my dead-lift went up. My squat might have moved a little, and my bench press stayed the same. My jump didn't increase.
Two athletes followed the program at the same time as me. They had much better results. You might also like to know that these two athletes only had about a year or so of lifting weights under their belt. (we actually don't wear belts, but you get the expression)
I'm not about to conclude anything from this, but I do know that novices actually respond better to higher volume, and this may have added to their success.
Higher volume is important for novices mostly because it allows them to practice. Now before you argue that you can't practice with maximal weights keep in mind that what a novice calls their maximum weight isn't a true max. For example you could have a novice hit a 1RM of 185 lbs and get crumbled by an additional 5 pounds, but in the same day bust out a set of 10 at 150... Say what you will about that, meanwhile I'm getting weak people jacked and powerful off of parkour and high volume lifting ;)

Off seasons are definitely necessary if you lift as much weight as someone like Andy or myself. However instead of calling it an off season, I'm going to refer to "conjugated-periodization" meaning you're going to grease in some heavy lifts every now and then during a heavy technical period, and vice versa. If you don't use it you will lose it. Or at least some of "it".
God help the guy who wants to do a lot of huge jumps and squat 350 lbs in the same week, and expect to progress for very long. I'm not saying its impossible because some of you are freaks. I probably train more than what is recommended sometimes, and I think my abilities reflect it, but I've never had to back away from my training because of injury or exhaustion.

I haven't read Blane's article yet. It's 1:30 am and i don't know if I'll actually read it later or not considering I know the principles of 5/3/1 inside out. I do think this is a great topic though, and I'm happy to be involved in conversations like these!

Night!

Offline NateVD

  • Oryctolagus Cuniculus
  • *
  • Posts: 37
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #43 on: February 14, 2011, 03:36:51 AM »
Now you get to prep for a rant... a respectful rant, of course.

Firstly, the "gains" you are seeing from the "conditioning" you are doing is due to the fact that people who are untrained (that is, dont or never have followed a training program) seem to gain strength very quickly because of neurological adaptation and motor learning.
[/quote]
I see the physiology behind weightlifting and where you're going with this but I was talking in regards to experienced practitioners who still see steady improvements in all facets of their physical development - whether it be plyometric movements to long distance running.

[/quote]
After all, by that stage, you have probably executed 10s of thousands of jumps, but still haven't worked on the strength you need to progress beyond that.
[/quote]
Perhaps its a lot of barefoot training. I dunno. But I still see the progress of many around me who do little or no strength work.

[/quote]
Secondly - I think you are defining "conditioning" wrong. The conditioning in S&C means the act of preparing your body for an event or force or situation.  Conditioning means to change your body in some way.  PKGen promotes what I call "pointless conditioning" because the exercises that they call "conditioning" do not prepare the body in the way that they are saying it does.  In fact, it makes it more vulnerable to injury.  Any orthopedic, personal trainer or experienced intellectual trainee will (and should) tell you that.  Now, don't get me wrong, I am not saying that these professionals are some sort of end-all, but to ignore this and think that jumping up and down for 45 minutes straight is somehow helping your vertical leap is laughable and irresponsible. 
[/quote]
What is your idea of proper conditioning?


[/quote]
All of this is mostly thanks to PKGen.
[/quote]
Fortunately its not like that in Australia.

[/quote]
(TL;DR up until now - What you are calling conditioning is not conditioning.  You are seeing gains because your trainees are what is considered "untrained" or "novices" in the terms of S&Cin the terms of S&C.  We DO promote conditioning, even though most American's don't actually take our advice).
[/quote]
Understood.

[/quote]
Parkour is none of these things and all of these things.  Strong to be useful - YES this is the point. We are promoting strength that is USEFUL.
[/quote]
My idea of useful strength differs from yours. Perhaps this comes from personal experience.
Maybe you've had to lift something heavy to assist someone whereas I've had to fight, run and give first aid in an effort to be useful. Maybe it's these different yet similar experiences that outline the way you and I train.

[/quote]
If you think that training and achieving even a modest goal of a 1.5xBW squat is NOT useful, then you have never done it and cannot fully appreciate the doors this opens up in your training.  And as much as a 1.5xBW squat opens doors, a 2.5xBW DL and 2.2xBW squat opens even more doors.  Strong to be useful - this is strength that is very useful.  Sadly, this is not something that can be explained, but needs to be experienced.
[/quote]
I am walking through these open doors now that I'm ligament deficient. On that note, its amazing what it takes for someone to start lifting weights.

[/quote]
Jumping around in a park for 3 hours 1x a week and doing some army crawls on the ground is great, really great - its fun and it DOES prepare you for army-type stuff....but have you ever walked your groups through workouts that you would find on www.crossfit.com or www.sealfit.com?... Jumping around for 4 hours and doing fireman's carries or whatever you do does not.  If you DO do thing similar to sealfit/crossfit or strength training, then I stand corrected; but I would be VERY surprised if you did.
[/quote]
And so you should be. Where they do pull ups, we do no-feet climb ups. Where they do a oly-lifting movement we do a running jump or wallrun. Now that I've scanned the site and its workouts, we do do something similar except its more plyometric and the only time we get rest is when we start running to another spot again which could 2-5km away.
As you said before, it has to be experienced. It is amazing what your body and mind can do when you're exhausted. These sessions are rewarding and what you achieve can, in my opinion, never be surmounted by what you achieve in the gym.

[/quote]
PKGen's 2 hour dive bomber pushup workout
[/quote]
LOLWAT!

[/quote]
I am sorry, but if you make your living on parkour (i.e. Blane and the trainers at PK Gen) then you need to understand the science behind training, even if you just choose to refute it.  Saying "I don't know, therefore it is not good" just doesnt cut the mustard anymore.
[/quote]
Respect, 100%. I totally appreciate your stance on S&C and agree with it. I can also see you love your community and have a burning passion for their improvement but also their safety and general health and well being. Perhaps the US community doesn't differ than much from the Aussie community (apart from the vault terminology).

P.S.
When I find it, I will pm you the APA (Australian Parkour Association) presidents email. He's an interesting man with an interesting background.



Offline Kyle L Larson

  • Mangabey
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #44 on: February 14, 2011, 07:04:22 AM »
Just wanted to point out that I did PKGen's way of training for most of my 'training years'. I improved quite a bit and made steady improvements for as long as I did them. Or, what I considered steady improvements at the time. Until I started actually lifting, lifting right and lifting heavy, I had no idea what I was missing out on. The 'steady gains' of my previous exercises wound up looking like a giant waste of time.

Also, just to point it out from personal experience, most military have actually begun to admit that they are behind on the times in terms of training practices. Their primary objective is to help build mental strength to endure obvious hardships. Actual strength gains in the military are crap and it wasn't until I took my training in my own hands that I actually became better at the things I do. The only people that see any gains are people that have never exercised or people that have never exercised properly. Anyways, they've been considering and trying to adapt their training to something more sophisticated.

Quote
My idea of useful strength differs from yours. Perhaps this comes from personal experience.
Maybe you've had to lift something heavy to assist someone whereas I've had to fight, run and give first aid in an effort to be useful. Maybe it's these different yet similar experiences that outline the way you and I train.


I won't  get too much into this. If you're not listening to Chris who is actually exploring things scientifically, you probably won't much listen to myself. However, I could not help but quote this as it seemed very silly to me.
I have to fight, run and give first aid. I didn't do weight lifting just so I can lift heavy things - although that can be a side-effect, it was and is not the purpose. Lifting heavy has allowed me to fight harder (more strength, more power), run faster (heavy squats and DL's have done amazing things to my legs)...
And neither PKGen or Weight Lifting has helped me with first aid, admittedly, as that's skill related. I don't think I've ever had to do a 300lb squat OR 100 unstructured jumps to better improve my capacity to bandage a wound.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2011, 07:16:59 AM by Kyle L Larson »

Offline Mr.WWII

  • Hirundo Rustica
  • *****
  • Posts: 749
  • Karma: +17/-0
  • Do what you can't, Parkour.
    • View Profile
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #45 on: February 14, 2011, 07:25:13 AM »
Yes, unfortunately, a significant portion of the American traceur community DOES NOT take our recommendations. I know countless traceurs that do no weight training and every time I bring it up to them they just close off their ears. A lot of people just prefer to ignore us because they'd rather pretend that just going out and jumping around every day is going to give them everything they want.

I think we also need to differentiate between what areas of parkour people are improving on based on their training. With weightifting significant improvements will be made in how far and high one can jump, how much power one can produce using their upper body when scaling walls, using bars, climbing things, running speed, how safely one can land from a drop.

PkGen style training will prob just help you with technical skills since you'll be doing so much repetition on them. Your precision form may be more controlled, but it won't be much further. Your wall climb ups will be pretty, but ya won't be going as high or as fast. Your vaults will be smooth, but ya won't be vaulting things as high and as long. You may have controlled strides and learn to jump longer gaps based on your controlled run up, but ya probably still won't be going as far as one who is far stronger than you are.

In general, pkgen stuff may help you improve on technical skills and creative mumbo-jumbo like rail flow and whatnot, but weight training is going to make you better at pure parkour. It's going to make you strong and useful.

Offline Sam Zytka

  • Hirundo Rustica
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
  • Karma: +21/-13
    • View Profile
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #46 on: March 15, 2011, 12:58:39 PM »
so i read through most of this basically because i was interested and i noticed that the steve's initial goal of the thread after the conversation with blane has been completely lost.  I think a program that outlines in detail for beginners, bodyweight and weight training, would be an amazing resource and would greatly benefit all. 

That being said the main problem i have with the structure you proposed (whether you are taking one full rest day or two)
monday- ss
tuesday- parkour skill
wednesday-ss
thursday- rest
friday-ss
saturday-parkour skill
sunday- recovery

the main problem i have with this is that I like to practice parkour as often as possible and if i could go out everyday i would.  I understand that proper rest is needed for proper progression but i feel as if many traceurs (at least myself) would rather go and practice parkour and have fun with it than rest because it was their designated rest day.  I strongly agree that weight training is extremely beneficial and should be incorporated into one's regiment, but at the same time i feel as if this model is (or could potentially) take a lot of the enjoyment out of the discipline.  I understand that overtraining is hazardous and will cause less progression but at the same time i feel as if you are looking at parkour as an ultimate end which is solely progression, whereas i think its also largely about having fun and enjoying yourself.  One of the most appealing things about parkour is the freedom and saying that you will only train on said days because you need to rest on other said days is basically objectifying something subjective.

i have never done a serious weight training program before and actually just started a structured regiment, but i know personally that even if I lift during a day, I still go out and train if i can.  When i go out I listen to my body and if im sore or tired than i wont do something that would further increase the soreness but i do still go out and train

so ultimately what i guess im saying is if there was some type of beginner program, for bodyweight or weight training, if its possible than you could incorporate more freedom as far as parkour training goes without risking injury due to over exercising?

Offline Steven Low

  • Moderator
  • Hirundo Rustica
  • *****
  • Posts: 5493
  • Karma: +281/-55
    • View Profile
    • Eat, Move, Improve
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #47 on: March 15, 2011, 01:39:10 PM »
I might like shipping out a day of SS in favor of more skill practice
Posts NOT medical, training or nutrition advice
Site // Overcoming Gravity Book

Offline max eisenberg

  • New Kid!
  • Hirundo Rustica
  • *****
  • Posts: 1747
  • Karma: +136/-274
    • View Profile
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #48 on: March 15, 2011, 02:24:07 PM »
the problem with the whole "lift heavy" thing is that MOST of us dont actually have access to weights and trainers that know what they are doing so WE dont hurt ourselves.

i would LOVE to get on a weight lifting program but, i have no weights, i have no professional and it would probably bring me more problems than it fixes.  hell my chiropractor cant even tell me why my right leg and ankle feel twisted.

youtube videos and comprehension of deadlift technique will only get you so far when you're using dumb bells and have really tight muscles.


my mind is constantly moving, one day my body will be strong enough to keep up.

Offline Steven Low

  • Moderator
  • Hirundo Rustica
  • *****
  • Posts: 5493
  • Karma: +281/-55
    • View Profile
    • Eat, Move, Improve
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #49 on: March 15, 2011, 04:08:18 PM »
1. See a different chiro or physical therapist

2. Use a camera (or borrow one) so we can look at your technique and tell you how to make corrections

Youtube, the internet, etc will get you VERY VERY far without a coach.

the only thing you would have trouble learning without a coach would be more or less Olympic lifts and maybe gymnastics stuff. DL/squat/etc. you can easily learn with camera/etc. and it's just laziness if you're not trying.
Posts NOT medical, training or nutrition advice
Site // Overcoming Gravity Book

Offline Brett Robert

  • EAF!
  • Hirundo Rustica
  • *****
  • Posts: 1298
  • Karma: +144/-16
  • It's ok to LOL about things that are srsbsnss.
    • View Profile
    • San Francisco Parkour
Re: 5/3/1 for Parkour - Blane's Article
« Reply #50 on: March 15, 2011, 08:11:41 PM »
I might like shipping out a day of SS in favor of more skill practice

I've done that and continued to increase strength, while getting in a nice PK balance too.