I don't know, to be honest, I don't think it's fair to demonize this kid based on the information we have here.
What's more, I know it's always been a collectively acceptable rule of thumb in these forums that if someone with negative intent interupts your training you should calmly and respectfuly explain to them what you are doing, parkour included.
my point is this, I don't really know what this kid did or who he is, he may very well be the idiot we're all painting him to be, but I've seen how creative media jargon can portray white as black, dark as light, and hero as villain. The fact is I'm not content to ostricize this kid untill I've heard his side of the story. Granted, that may never happen, but I mean some of this stuff just reeks of bias:
"He Bounds Over Buildings Police Spring to Action"
It's perfectly clear right from the start who the good guys and the bad guys are in this story, before we even begin reading.
Truth is, I'm not even sure he ever ran from the police, what we get are alot of "apparentlys"
It says police "caught" him, and they quote one officer who had to "chase him through downtown Lowell". You can take this in the context that they had to go through trouble in finding and stopping a guy who was running around and obviously elusive in his own unintentional right or in context that, yes, he did explicitly recongize and run from the police. The latter however would have been fully taken advantage of...
both by the police who would have charged him with resisting arrest, not just "trespassing and disorderly conduct" and by the paper who would have clearly stated that he tried to escape the police instead of just indirectly suggesting it.
I really don't know, but I think it's only right to read between the lines and give both sides a chance, am I wrong?