I’m glad to hear that you have people who are committed to the community. For us, however, we want a little bit more qualification in a teacher than "wants to help." That's great, and necessary, but for something like parkour, people who are in a leadership position should have a baseline knowledge of body mechanics (not just how this works but why this works), physical training (how to maximize your potential), and a thorough understanding of and passion for the discipline (origins/purpose/philosophy), in addition to the basic skill requirements you mentioned. I don't want to judge any of your guys when I haven't trained with them in a while, but when we see zoic people doing things that are clearly lacking in technique and/or purpose, it makes me think something is fundamentally missing in the zoic formula. Like that thing with the "15ft precision," where we saw kids posting videos of this "huge precision we did" that was really depressing cause they thought they'd actually accomplished something.
I don’t want to try to tell you how to do your thing, but I want to make clear the differences between us and why we do it the way we do.
When we run a teaching session we keep relatively small groups, in a practical environment, where we can provide individual attention and help them with whatever they need. All the while we’re talking to them about parkour. Where it came from, how to train, and helping them to develop goals and a purpose for their progression. If we don’t provide these things then we’re giving an incomplete message, and they’re only learning how to “jump on stuff” like idiots. Of course, this approach only works because we do lots of sessions with multiple qualified teachers every week and thus don’t get too crowded on any one day, so if your teachers can’t reliably lead sessions all the time, it makes it hard to provide that kind of attention. Trust me, I understand the difficulties of running such a big operation. (I remember, lol)
You're trying to keep up with lots of people all at once, and the only way to handle that is to boil down the movements into easily digestible chunks that can be taught in 10 seconds. I mean, that was the whole idea behind the teaching standards we made up together back in the day, but my understanding of parkour has developed a lot since then. While those things are good as a way of teaching the basic techniques to someone, they are not, in and of themselves, parkour. As soon as you start teaching a list of tricks to someone as "parkour," you destroy parkour for that person, turning into something trite and useless. This goes back to what I said before about misrepresentation. Take your recent sampler video for example. Lots of impressive tricks, flips, and bboying in there, with a few parkour movements thrown in. That's not parkour, it's barely even freerunning. The most accurate definition is Street Stunts. (To be clear, this is becoming an increasingly common thing in the worldwide “parkour” community, so it’s not just you.)
Again, I’m not trying to bash you guys or come down on you or anything, after all you have some very talented athletes with you, and I wouldn‘t expect you or them to change their athletic endeavors because of anything I say. I just want to make clear our position, what all this talk boils down to, is that Zoic is not (strictly speaking) Parkour, and when you promote it as such it sends an inaccurate message to the public. I don’t know what to tell you other than that, except know where your priorities lie and what you want from your organization. I’d be happy to meet up and train sometime when I’m in town, since I haven’t lived in Orlando for close to a year. Just keep in touch through facebook and whathaveyou.