" The following error or errors occurred while posting this message:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 60 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic. "
There was a sticky in the general discussion about using the search button and posting updated questions in existing threads rather than making a new one. Whatever though
To improve cv endurance, would you reccomend doing 400-800m sprints even if sprinting 300m requires a lot of recovery? Basically, should I sprint longer distances even if my cv endurance sucks and my sprint will detiorate to an exhausted jog halfway through? Currently, I do sets of 200m sprints and even one set takes a good amount of time to recover from (though I can keep the dead sprint pace throughout)
Thanks and sorry if I should be paying attention to that red warning thing!
Depends on what your distance(s) you're running (if you're competitively running).
Anything 400m or below with enough interval repeats should be enoguh to get you down UNDER 5-6 minute mile times.
Considering I don't run anymore than 400m, 70-80m repeats are the longest I'm going to run.
So basically... depends on what you're training for.... hwihc is why it's good to have specific goals.
If you're a 400m sprinter you're going to have phases where you run a couple 350-250m runs or something like that, and then days where you'er going to work on max sprinting ability in the 40-70m range, then days where you lift heavy,work on your start, etc.
All sub 50s 400m guys can easy get sub 5 miles.... just based on how fast they run 400m. So in generally, if you're going to run intervals you want to do between about 1/4-1/8th of the distance you're training for. For pure sprinting speed you're goign to want to stick with 30-70m or so with FULL rest (1 min for every 10m you run),.