Featured Wallpaper

Home
The efficiency Paradox Print E-mail
Saturday, 15 March 2008
 

This great article by Sam "Disciple " Slater talks about one of the seemingly contradictive parts of Parkour - training inefficiency to achieve efficiency. Exceprt: "I have been asked questions similar to this many times over the years, usually from people who feel that the only useful training is training that directly applies to the situation that you are preparing for.  When these people see a ‘traditional’ or more eclectic martial art, they see much of the training that is done as extraneous and unnecessary if the root of the art is supposed to be combat.  Because of the prevalence of modes of thought such as this, there are many new self-defense systems that have been created following this philosophy of training." - Read More for the full article.

While training martial arts the other day, one of our adult students approached me.  He had been watching me practice some high kicks, spinning kicks, and jump kicks for a few minutes, and had a question about my training.

 

            “Sir,” he said, “I have been here a year, and I have watched you in class, and I have never seen you use most of those techniques you were just practicing in sparring or self-defense applications.  Why do you practice them if you never have a reason to use them?”

 

            This was an excellent question.  I have been asked questions similar to this many times over the years, usually from people who feel that the only useful training is training that directly applies to the situation that you are preparing for.  When these people see a ‘traditional’ or more eclectic martial art, they see much of the training that is done as extraneous and unnecessary if the root of the art is supposed to be combat.  Because of the prevalence of modes of thought such as this, there are many new self-defense systems that have been created following this philosophy of training. 

 

            I have also had this conversation with people who watch my training for Parkour.  When they are given the definition of “getting to a destination as quickly and directly as possible with minimal effort” and then see me practicing precisions, working on weaving over, under, and around rails, or doing quadrupedal movement they immediately ask how that applies to getting somewhere fast. 

 

“Why would you be crawling somewhere?  If you were trying to get somewhere fast, why would you stop after a long jump?  Wouldn’t it be faster to just run around that rail than to be moving through it?” 

 

In their minds I should just be practicing sprinting, jumping, and upper body strength.  While these are very important aspects of training, they do not train the body to be able to adapt to various situations.  They do not train the mind to see the multitude of opportunities for traversing obstacles that are in one’s way.  Without the more creative elements of training, the individual ends up only training the body and not the mind.  Moving in a straight line might be the shortest distance between two points, however if your mind isn’t trained to be able to creatively view the environment that you happen to be in, you could miss a safer route or a route that would make it more difficult for a pursuer to follow.  Thus, by training “inefficient” movements you become more efficient on the whole.

 

            Training, especially in a discipline such as Parkour, should be about expansion and growth.  Based upon the definition that Parkour is a method of training for instances where the individual must overcome the obstacles in the environment more expediently, it would make sense to develop the body and focus on expanding the realm of its capabilities.  The more your body is able to do, and the better able your mind is to perceive the body’s capabilities and control the body’s actions, the better prepared you will be for whatever situation you find yourself in.  If you were to only train in certain areas of development and you happened to be presented with a situation that required you to react or move in a manner that you had not trained for, then I would hope that it wasn’t a life threatening one.  Life is unpredictable.  The best one can do to be prepared for the multitude of minute changes that can occur in any situation is to become as fully aware of oneself and his or her capabilities as possible.  This is done through a firm grounding in discipline at first, and then once the individual has grown to a certain point, their expansion should also move outside the realm of that discipline and begin to include other disciplines so as to better develop the individual. (This could be a whole other topic)

 

            Now some might argue that through the training of anything might then count towards training for Parkour.  I would have to argue that this is not true.  Training the body and improving oneself are an important part of Parkour, however it is the mindset during training, and the addition of training in certain specific scenarios that set Parkour apart from other movement disciplines.  Without the philosophy behind the training, most all movement disciplines become just movement or exercise.

 

            In the end, all disciplines are systems with a guiding philosophy that aid the practitioner in achieving some end.  They are guides to action, thought, and life, but they are just guides.  You can follow many guides on the path to personal development, or you can strictly follow one.  What is important is that it is understood what the goals of ones discipline are and what ones own goals are.  Don’t let a discipline limit you.



Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Display 13 of 13 comments

1. 03-15-2008 07:09

It is like a finger, pointing towards the moon. Don't look at the finger, or you'll miss all that heavenly glory. 
 
-Bruce Lee

2. 03-16-2008 02:34

That was a very good read.I have never been asked one of those questions, and never really thought about it either. I will think about what I say now.

3. 03-16-2008 04:26

Great article + insight, I have thought about many of the same things in my training + had hoped that many of the new traceurs out there understand the differences/similarities between training for parkour and bettering yourself (or saving your life in a dangerous situation for that matter). Keep up the good work..

4. 03-16-2008 04:47

Great article Sam!
akh

5. 03-17-2008 12:02

Train for the worst, hope for the best.

6. 03-18-2008 15:46

abloluteley inspiring!! :p :p

7. 03-18-2008 16:33

Yeh, gotta give you props on this one.

8. 03-19-2008 11:20

Very awesome post! 
 
- :) 
 
pkinaz.blogspot.com for pk and freerun info!

9. 03-21-2008 07:20

Very nice Sam!

10. 03-22-2008 00:25

Good work on the post Sam. I especially liked your point on creativity and possibly missing a safer route. Unfortunately you missed the whole physiological principles behind dynamic training. Training movements that aren’t directly responsible for “getting to a destination as quickly and directly as possible with minimal effort” reinforce the efficiency of our muscular systems. And the reason you can’t train just the fast stuff is because if you neglect any systems in your training then you compromise the integrity and efficiency of the entire system (i.e. your body).

11. 04-02-2008 14:44

MisterParkour and Sam, you are both right. Parkour is dangerous to the body when the body is not conditioned, that is why it requires so much strength and cannot be rushed. Great article though.

12. 11-20-2008 20:08

The typical progression of core training (like any other activity) is to build from the basics outward. With core one initially learns control of the fundamental core mucles of the torso as as one gains the ability to intially control them for extended periods of time (building core endurance and control)and proceding to do the same over more difficult environments (in core it progresses through controlling initial core upon unstable environments ie the physioball). Once mastered core progresses outward to the proximal musculature that acts off of the core and proceeded to do the same(con't)

13. 11-20-2008 20:15

I've read your article with great interest. I'm new to Parkour and am in the beginners stage - after reading your article my question is are there are could we develop training stations that would allow us to master the basic and progress through continuing "unstable environments" . For example, in a practice field when doing a 180 from one wall to the other, making the handhold on the opposing wall on the left hand "give a little" forcing the person to have to react to an ever changing but controlled environment - to better prepare them for what may occur on the streets.

Display 13 of 13 comments

Only registered users can comment an article. Please login or register.

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.6 © 2007-2009 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev   Next >
©2009 American Parkour. All Rights Reserved.